articles de presse
sujets d'examen
les PPCP
TICE & multimédia
PFE à l'étranger
dossiers
voyage à l'étranger
publications
stagiaires IUFM
conseillers pédago.
bourse d'échanges
l'assistant

 

The United States Presidential elections 2000

The economy
Taxation and social security
International affairs
Health
Gun control
Environment
Education
Capital punishment
Character
 


The economy
With steady growth throughout the Clinton era and unemployment currently hovering at around five per cent, the state of America's economy is a definite vote-winner for Al Gore's Democrats. But in times of relative prosperity, presidential campaigns have historically focused on peripheral issues and it is unclear how important the economy will prove to be in this year's election. In the high-tech sector there has been some recent activity, and both Bush and Gore have made manifesto pledges to offer tax breaks for internet companies. Beyond this however, most political analysts predict that (unless there is something of an economic collapse) America's economy will stay out of the headlines for the forseeable future.



Taxation and social security
In the early stages of his campaign, Mr Bush paid lip service to traditional Republican values by promising not to introduce new taxes during his presidency , and offering to replace the five-tier income tax structure with four lower rates. This move is central to the "compassionate conservatism" Bush has based his campaign on because it is designed to mostly benefit those with lower incomes . Importantly, this has helped widen Bush's appeal beyond traditional party support, whereas Gore's policy - that tax cuts should be limited, with any surplus used to reduce the national debt and prop up public services - has only appealed to Democrat-leaning voters. As the election battle entered its final stages, Bush has moved further on the offensive over taxation, claiming that his opponent will be the "biggest spender" in the history of politics. Scaremongering maybe, but a reasonably reliable way of turning the instictively right-wing American electorate against his opponent. In another vein, whatever both candidates are saying, an overhaul of the nation's social security system (which provides pensions) will be needed when the present "baby boom" generation reaches retirement. With millions of extra pensioners, analysts say that the president of the day will either have to increase taxes or raise the retirement age to keep his government from bankruptcy. Neither measure will be particularly popular with voters, so this (rather important) issue has, mysteriously, been more-or-less sidelined throughout.



International affairs
Mr Clinton's record on arms proliferation has been patchy and Republicans are sure to exploit the fact that India and Pakistan both detonated nuclear bombs during his administration. The Republicans will also remind voters that American nuclear secrets were last year stolen by China in one of the most damaging leaks since the Cold War. These events all occurred while Mr Gore was serving as vice president, and Republicans will attempt to portray him as a naive statesman who will struggle to represent America on the international stage. However, their candidate is hardly the man to preach about foreign affairs: Mr Bush was famously, unable to name the leaders of four foreign countries during a television interview and has also expressed concern for the "Grecians", "Kosovians" and "East Timorians". More recently, Bush announced that he would pull US troops out of the Balkans . This might cause a fundamental rethink of NATO, but it would also save America's public purse many billions of dollars each year. However, nobody wins elections - least of all American ones - by appearing to be soft on foreign affairs, so it remains to be seen if Bush's latest initative will prove to be a vote-winner.



Health
Never as much of an issue in the US elections, principally because the country's tradition of private health care makes it is less of a government priority. This said, many Democratic Party supporters would like to see some sort of health reform, and Mr Clinton has recently called for increased government spending on the sector. Mr Gore could well win votes on this issue, but he would be playing a dangerous game: the US voting public are generally reluctant to endorse regulations that result in increased taxation. So although Texas, where Mr Bush is state governor, has the union's largest number of women without any form of health insurance, Mr Gore has so far been reluctant to make health a key election issue.



Gun control
America has a famously relaxed attitude towards firearm ownership, but after a series of shootings at schools there are signs that the tide is beginning to turn against the country's powerful gun lobby. In May more than 100,000 mothers marched through central Washington in support of increased controls, and anti-gun campaigners are expected to make firearm law a key issue in the forthcoming election. Interestingly, Mr Clinton tried to toughen gun laws last year , but his initiative was vetoed by Republican leaders in congress, whose party has received considerable support from the National Rifle Association. Although the American population is divided over how best to deal with gun deaths, the issue remains a potential vote-winner for Mr Gore particularly amongst women, who are in favour of increased controls by a proportion of around three to one.



Enviroment
Mr Gore can lay claim to being an expert on the environment, having recently written a book on the subject, and sees it as a crucial vote winner in the fight for America's female vote. He has previously spoken about the importance of creating eco-friendly federal purchasing policies and, as one of his first priorities in office, will try to secure the participation of India in the Kyoto project to combat global warming . Mr Bush is thought to be vulnerable here because of the record of his state: Texas was recently declared the most polluted in the union, thanks mostly to its economic reliance on the oil trade. In addition, Mr Bush is an active opponent of the Kyoto agreement, saying that it is based on "social fads" rather than sound science, and will harm US business. Mr Bush may well have a point, but he is alienating a significant section of the electorate on this and Mr Gore will hope that America's growing green lobby will vote in his favour on polling day.



Education
Mr Bush made education a top priority while governor of Texas, and the issue is one of the few areas on which he is prepared to make concrete policy announcements. He hit the headlines last year after promising to replicate parts of the Tory education policy by stripping failing schools of their funds and redistributing the money to parents, who could either pay for tutors or transfer their children to better schools. In a split that has seen battle lines drawn along traditional party-political lines, Mr Gore immediately attacked Mr Bush's proposals (saying they will lead to the closure of hundreds of state schools) and adopted a broadly left-wing agenda, opposed to cutting taxes and in favour of increasing spending on education. At this stage it is not clear which policy will appeal to crucial floating voters amongst the US electorate, but historically the education issue is essential for mobilising each party's core vote, and both candidates are fighting to claim this battleground as their own.



Capital punishment
The issue generated heated debate after George Bush, in his capacity as Governor of Texas, rejected calls for the pardon of Gary Graham, the convicted murderer who was executed by lethal injection in June . Opponents of the death penalty have rounded on Mr Bush, who has overseen the execution of 137 prisoners during his six years as state governor. This figure is far higher than that of any previous incumbent, and could be seen as being at odds with the "compassionate conservatism" he otherwise preaches. With public support for the death penalty falling from around 80 to 66 per cent in recent years , Mr Gore has argued for a "third way" approach to the issue: saying that death penalty convictions should be re-examined thoroughly if there were doubts, but supporting execution in principle. With this tactic, he hopes to draw votes from the growing proportion of Americans who are uneasy with the death penalty, whilst avoiding any accusation of being soft on crime.



Character
Difficult to judge. Mr Clinton's legacy has left the electorate looking for a squeaky clean candidate to restore some dignity to the office of president, but neither of the front-runners really fits the bill: claims persist about Mr Bush's apparently wild youth , while Mr Gore was Mr Clinton's right hand man throughout the Monica Lewinsky scandal , and is facing charges of illegal fund-raising tactics during the 1996 election. A more important battleground may lie in the candidates' respective performances on America's television screens. On a superficial level, Mr Bush's personable manner leaves him streets ahead of the uninspiring Mr Gore. However, Mr Bush has previously been criticised for political superficiality and certainly has a propensity to make gaffes under pressure. He has already tripped up on several occasions, but thus far Mr Gore has failed to exploit his undoubted intellectual superiority.


 

page précédente

sommaire

page suivante

g